Monday, July 21, 2008


This Blog is Closed
I've decided to focus on other areas and blogging will detract from those goals.

Many of you are intelligent enough to know the challenges America will face if Obama wins and the Democrats hold Congress. Undivided power with the Democrats is something even most Democrats can't begin to imagine.

Obama is a Socialist idiot and nothing I place in this blog will open the eyes of the sheeple who still follow him, so I will stop preaching to the choir.

Continue to enjoy life and have fun when you can find it.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

They Don't Teach Geography at Harvard (Obviously)

The Messiah traveled to Afghanistan and declared, with the Heavenly Host at his back that...
"We're in Afghanistan because this is the central front in the war on terrorism."
Unfortunately for the Messiah, the Heavenly Host was comprised of Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Chuck Hagel (Rino-NE), and neither one found the internet in Afghanistan. If they had access to the internet, they could have found the following information helpful:

Al Qaeda is operating in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of PAKISTAN. Pakistan is to the east of Afghanistan. You might remember AFGHANISTAN; that' where we already kicked the crap out of Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

Here are a few more stats to help you out:

Number of Terrorists Killed in Iraq: 20,000+
Number of Terrorists Killed in Afghanistan: 3,700+
Number of Terrorists Killed in Pakistan: ? Not Many By U.S.

The reason we haven't killed many terrorists in Pakistan is because it is an ally on the War on Terror.
Certainly we could do better than Pakistan as an ally. In fact, Al Qaeda and the Taliban have even negotiated peace treaties with Pakistan to allow them to operate there (see: Waziristan Accords).

So, Mr. MESSiah, when you say Afghanistan is the central front in the war on terrorism... ummm...what part of Afghanistan were you talking about? Does your omniscience detect some hidden part of Afghanistan being run by Al Qaeda?

Or perhaps you weren't paying attention in Geography class and are confusing Afghanistan and Pakistan. You did take a Geography class didn't you?

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Predicting the Next Obamifecation ™


"We all know that the surge topped out at 168,000 troops, but current troop strength is only about 147,000...and you can thank the next President of the United States, Senator Obama.

The American people should know that Senator Obama's Omnipotence and Glory have resulted in an immediate troop decrease. His mere presence in the war torn region have caused (err.. let's see 168 minus 147, uhhh...carry the one..) 21,000 troops to simply evaporate from Iraq. That's right, America, and the Great One has only begun to reduce our presence in Iraq.

What Bush and McCain have failed to do...reduce troop strength was done in ONE DAY by Senator Obama. See you at the polls in November."

Wow, now that Obama is FINALLY going to Iraq, life is so much better.

I'll bet he could have removed Saddam from power with a wave of his arm.

I truly believe The Chosen One could have stopped Saddam from whittling away the sanctions by uncovering the corruption of the Useless Nincompoops simply by blinking his eyes.

And without question he could have intercepted the millions of Oil for Food dollars that Saddam used to rebuild his army and fund suicide bombers in Israel with a simple passing of his Holy Feces.

Yes, life certainly is beautiful when you have a Messiah on your side.

Hey, any of you guys got an IED with you?

"Hey Mohammed, let's go place an IED in the road to kill the infidel."

"Good Idea Mustafa! Let's go."

New Magazine Cover

Friday, July 18, 2008


Last month this blog was the #1 link for the Google search on "obama idiocy".

-- We are still there today -- Yippeee!

Also, last month I stated that crude prices would drop to $55 a barrel if we collectively (the President and Congress) announced we would drill for oil immediately.

-- It was only the President who stood up and lifted the Executive Order banning OCS drilling and the price of crude fell 11 percent. It fell, even though the dollar still lost ground. Since oil is traded using dollars, in real economic terms, oil fell farther than 11 percent.

Coincidence? Hmmm....

Time for Congress to step up and prove me wrong.

Where ya' at Nancy? Harry, are you too "sick" to pass this legislation?

Krauthammer's Ken

Charles Krauthammer violates the 11th Commandment of the media as he closely examines Obama. His article basically asks "Who is this man who believes he can stop the rising of the seas and redeem our lives?"


One of the most astute political observers of our time, Krauthammer exposes the arrogance and self-importance of the Obamessiah.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

How Dare They?

Forgive them O Mighty Goracle for they know not what they do!!! LINK

Do not bring forth the wrath of your rotund presence nor bring down the lightning of your egoistic and only begotten son, The Obamessiah.

The physicists at the American Physical Society meant no harm when they implied you are

(don't send your progeny to smite me please Goracle, I did not say it -- it was the scientists!)

These venal and petty little PhDs said that Globull Warmening is not caused by Man..I know, I know, they must be in the pockets of Big Oil. You know that those slimy, oil drenched liars are just jealous because you made more money than any of their CEOs by proclaiming the TRUTH!

They even said...
"In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years ... Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth."

PSHAW!!!! HEATHENS!!! How would they know? Liars!

The Boumedienne Edict

When in doubt, consult an expert.

When the Supreme Court's liberal wing decided to grant habeus corpus to terrorists, they failed to do some in-depth research on the recipients of their insipidity.

Thomas Joscelyn gives one example in THIS excellent article.

He shows that the aftermath of Boumedienne may be deadly to our efforts against terror. Specifically, Joscelyn, Giuliani's former senior campaign advisor on terrorism, describes the case of Huzaifa Parhat. Read his account and see if you agree that Boumedienne is already leading to the regret expressed by Scalia.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Put This Woman in JAIL!!!!

I heard Glenn Beck say something today that spurred me to conduct some research.

The other day the federal gummint decided to save Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are hybrids of the free market and the federal gummint. Fannie was established during the Depression to ensure mortgage money was available for lenders. It was converted to a public company in 1968, but still regulated and backed by the gummint. Freddie was created by Congress in 1970 for the same reason. Now to get to the point...

They say the Enron scandal cost investors $60 Billion dollars. The Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac rescue by the federal government is going to help cover $1.5 TRILLION dollars in losses. That is 25 times the losses of Enron.

The problems with Fannie and Freddie didn't appear overnight. In fact, in 2004, due to "significant accounting problems" Congress began requiring them to hold 30% more cash than previously required.

Hmmm...2004...why is that important.
Maybe because from 1998 to 2003, Jamie Gorelick, Clinton's deputy Attorney General, was the vice chair of Fannie Mae.
You remember Jamie Gorelick, don't you? Ms Gorelick was the deputy Attorney General who built "the wall" between the FBI and CIA that prevented them from sharing information on the 9/11 hijackers. Here is one agent's response...

"At that time, a frustrated FBI investigator wrote headquarters, quote, 'Whatever has happened to this--someday someone will die--and wall or not--the public will not understand why we were not more effective and throwing every resource we had at certain 'problems.' "
Gorelick, the feckless REMF, impeded our capabilities in fighting terrorism in March 1995, then after doing her damage there, she took over Fannie Mae in 1998 and ran it into the ground. All the while, Ms Gorelick was paid 26 MILLION DOLLARS. Some of her bonus money was obtained when Fannie Mae represented itself as more profitable than it really was -- in other words, the "significant accounting problems".

Gorelick, you might remember, also sat on the "911 Commission". How convenient. She, like most liberals, deflected her part in 9-11 away from herself and onto Bush during those hearings.

I'll bet the FBI agent quoted above was PISSED OFF!! I know I am.

Everything Gorelick touches turns to shit.. so I only have one question?

How does she get away with this? I'm going to write my congressman and ask him to investigate her role in destabilizing Fannie Mae.

Meet the New Barbie - Not Like the Old Barbie

If you're a mother and you buy this for your daughter, you deserve the years of anorexia, teen pregnancy, and drug abuse that your daughter will likely experience.

This is actually a real Barbie model sold by Mattel...

Meet "Liberal Drug Addict Hooker Barbie"

...well, except for the name. It is intended to be super-heroine Black Canary Barbie.

Yeah, uh-huh...

Ken, yo' betta' show some green, or Barbie be takin' that tail 'cross the street, homes.

I Get It

This is why Obama is going to Iraq -- reinforcements.

The Democratic Telethon is Just Around the Corner

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Comparative Military Strength

Each former President of the United States has a chance to be immortalized by having a naval vessel named after them.

Here you can see the mighty USS RONALD REAGAN. Massive size and power that dwarfs the Arizona Memorial in the background...

Next you can see the embodiment of the frugal manner William Jefferson Clinton administered his role as commander in chief. Always looking to save money so he could balance the budget on the backs of the military. This also exemplifies his impotence (errr...I meant militarily, of course).

And now, the US military, anticipating an Obama victory in November, have drawn up plans to honor the next Commander in Chief...

Note the sleek new design -- equipped with sails that face both ways, the design honors President Obama's lickety-split CHANGES of direction on every issue ever uttered from his mouth. Whichever way the wind blows, Obama can tack to that position. Twin "SS OBAMA" designations allow his followers to believe he was always headed in that direction -- and most will believe him.

Monday, July 14, 2008


Another level of Obama shifting his position...this one posted on The QandO Blog:

Obama Voted Against Your Right to Defend Yourself (Before he Supported the Supreme Court's Heller Decision)

Michael Yon Declares Victory in Iraq

But sees a lot of work left in Afghanistan now that the rats have rebuilt themselves in the land of our "ally" Pakistan...LINK

So now, he's heading there.

POLL: Forty-Seven Percent of Americans Too Stupid to Vote

A recent Newsweek poll asked this question to registered voters:
"Some people say that since Barack Obama became the presumed Democratic nominee for president, he has changed his position on key policy issues to try to gain political advantage. Do you agree or disagree?" (LINK Page 5)
Only 53% agreed with this statement. Thirty-two percent disagreed and fifteen percent simply looked up at the pollster and said "huh?", as drool spilled down the front of their shirts.

So 47% could not see the flip flops on FISA (amnesty for telecoms), troop withdrawal time lines, the Washington DC gun ban, etc. etc. etc... ad nauseum...

I only have ONE poll question -- was this poll conducted exclusively in Los Angeles or New York? Either way, we should seriously consider a Constitutional Amendment to strip that 47% of their right to vote.

Here is my proposal for the 28th Amendment:

28th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to Reform the 15th Amendment:

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State unless the citizen has so willfully blinded themselves to the proven facts of a campaign as to be dangerous to themselves and others.

Section 2. This means you, Los Angeles and New York City.

Section 3. And anyone who reads the Huffington Post.

Section 4. The End.

Section 5. Really. We're done now.

Section 6. Don't read any further.

Section 7. If you read this far, you are also subject to this Amendment. Now go away.

Sunday, July 13, 2008

The Cost of Bitching

Seems that the Contrarian desire to bitch about everything may have caused the collapse of IndyMac Bank.

The Office of Thrift Supervision is blaming Senator Chucky Schumer for the failure of IndyMac Bank. Apparently a letter by Schumer questioning IndyMac's viability was followed by depositors withdrawing $1.3 billion dollars from the bank.

The self-fulfilling prophecy is an off shoot of the Thomas Theorem...
"If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences"
Schumer, being a member of the Senate Banking Committee, and part of the Democratic "we love to regulate" Party, was in the absolutely worst position to express such negative opinions. Compounding the current mortgage and banking crisis is not the best and smartest thing a "leader" can do..

Besides, he should be out looking for his Weiner.

UPDATED - A Vote for Obama is a Vote for a Third Bush Term

The Obama campaign makes the argument that a vote for McCain is a third term for President Bush. But here at TJ's Anti-Contrarian Blog our crack research team has uncovered the truth. (Our research team is composed of Democrats, so, yes, they are all on crack.)
Besides the examples listed previously (and below), we can now add the following similarities between Obama and Bush:

- Obama likes the idea of Faith-based initiatives

- Obama believes abortions should not be allowed when "mental anguish" is the only reason given by a woman

- Obama cheered the Supreme Court decision overturning the Washington DC gun ban

- Obama thinks NAFTA is a great idea

- Obama believes we should all speak Spanish (after all, George Bush already does), and finally,

- Obama is just as inexperienced on the national stage as was George Bush in 2000

Meanwhile, the Left just winks at Obama, believing that he will CHANGE these positions as soon as he gets into office. But then, they thought that about Clinton until Clinton signed the Welfare Reform Newt Gingrich sent to him.

All votes were verified through the Congressional Record:


On Senate Amendment 3896 to Senate Amendment 3899 to Senate Bill 1200 - This amendment cut off funding of abortions under the Indigenous Health Bill

- Barack Obama chose not to oppose this amendment in order to keep his Primary hopes alive against Hillary. He and George Bush agree on abortion.

On Senate Amendment 3330 to Senate Amendment 3325 to HR 3043 which prohibited funds in the bill from being granted to organizations that perform abortions when a woman's life is not in danger, unless the organization is a hospital.

- Barack Obama chose not to oppose this amendment to keep his Primary hopes alive against Hillary. He and George Bush agree.


On Senate Amendment 4231 to Senate Concurrent Resolution 70 which allows the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee to increase spending levels for certain border security and immigration enforcement programs.

- Barack Obama voted against this amendment, preventing more action on the border fence. He and George Bush agree on border security.


On December 18, 2007, Obama had the opportunity to vote for the Feingold "Iraq Withdrawal Amendment", which was a...

Vote to adopt an amendment to an amendment to re-deploy troops in Iraq within 90 days, with the exception of those troops needed for temporary purposes to conduct targeted operations against al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations, to provide security for U.S. government personnel, to provide training to members of the Iraqi Security Forces who have not been involved in attacks against the U.S. Armed Forces, or to provide training and equipment to members of the U.S. Armed Forces to maintain and improve their safety and security.
Did Obama vote to end the war -- NO!!! He and George Bush agree on the Iraq War!!!

These are just a few of the votes of Barak Obama -- so while he points to McCain as Bush's third term -- it's really OBAMA who seems to follow Bush's legislative guidance.

And like President Bush he plans on spending FAR TOO MUCH money on entitlements. Can we really afford an Obama Presidency???

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Congress' Brand New Sweater

San Francisco Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D-CA) introduced her first piece of legislation the other day. She offered the The Gasoline Savings and Speed Limit Reduction Act.

Yes, that's right, Congress has been talking about reducing the national speed limit to 55 mph. This effort is ostensibly to save you some gasoline costs. But, what about your time?

America is a large, diverse country. In crowded East Coast cities a 55 mph speed limit might be workable, but in the Western United States and rural areas, 55 mph is a waste of our time. In an increasingly busy world, how much time is Congress willing to steal from us?

Speier's idea is the "Carter Sweater" reborn. When faced with an energy crisis, instead of drilling for new capacity, Jimmy Carter told us to lower our thermostats and put on a sweater. The Carter Sweater is an analog for those who do not possess American innovation, and worse, possess an external locus of control. Those with an external locus of control believe circumstances form their reality rather than having to take charge and form the world the way they want it to be.

To avoid personal angst and frustration an internal locus of control...
"needs to be matched by competence, self-efficacy and opportunity so that the person is able to successfully experience the sense of personal control and responsibility"
America has always formed the world using it's genius and creativity; unless Democrats are in charge. Could it be that they lack "competence and self-efficacy"? (Was that too rhetorical?)

Let's watch and see how many Western State senators and rural area represenatives are willing to wear the Carter Sweater.

Friday, July 11, 2008

Barack's Bogus Journey

The Brandenburg Gate --

...apparently the site of an upcoming visit by Barack Hussein Obama. Of course the New York Times tries to imply parallels between Obama's visit and the visit by President John F. Kennedy in 1963. I'm sure Obama, with his arrogant and narcissistic opinion of himself, has also thought about this "similarity".

Won't they be surprised when, instead of declaring "Ich bin ein Berliner", Obama turns toward the East, bows to Moscow, and declares "Ich bin ein Socialist."

Obama's socialist tendencies, his desire to create so many more social programs than even Bush has and his penchant for wanting to "punish" the oil companies, will make Kennedy look like Reagan.

Maybe Obama can ask the Germans if he can also vacation at the Berghof as have other National Socialists.

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Oh NO!! Global Warming is Here!!!!

Oops. just kidding.

But these people must have believed Al Gore.

You see, one day these folks wanted to go for a walk. And they knew it would get hot because the Goracle proclaimed the "Earth has a fayver". So they went for their walk without their stifling, hot clothing.

Unfortunately, they discovered what kind of boobs they were when they came across a Glacier....

Boy, were their faces red.


It seems like just last month that I reached 10,000 hits and now I'm up to 15,000. (Actually 10,000 was in March 2008 LINK.)
And I still owe it all to the woman pictured in the above link. I've also narrowed down the incoming searches to Germany. So apparently, there are a lot of Germans too dumb to spell Bianca Beauchamp and instead type "BEAUCHUMP".

I'm thoroughly amazed.

But I also owe a lot to FERD, LEB, Brooke, RT, Angel, Free, Megabrad, Chris C, edge, Damian, and if I forget anyone please forgive...I'd also like to thank the academy for giving me this award, even in these times of strife and Globull Warmening. Soon we can bring CHANGE to Washington with your help by ....

and fixing this country in the New Revolution of 2008 .


Tuesday, July 08, 2008

<-- See that

That's Mount Shasta in California....

It seems that the glacier on Mount Shasta has measurably increased. Wha!?!? What about GloBull Warming?

Well, the GloBull Warming crows caw that GloBull Warming has increased the moisture in the air and thus this counter-intuitive phenomenon.

However, what they can't explain is... how the warmer GloBull Warming air condensed that moisture into snow rather than rain.....hmmmmmm....

You Wanted it, You Got It

Remember the big Democrat take over of Congress?

Remember how people looked forward to a CHANGE in Washington?

How's that CHANGE workin' out? Congressional Performance Poll

Can we afford more CHANGE?

Monday, July 07, 2008

The Price of Oil Courtesy of Your Democrat Congress

Since President Bush took office, the national average gasoline price has risen 242%. Using straight division (rather than compounding percentages), that's about 34% per year. LINK

Since the Democrats took over Congress, gasoline prices have risen 132% (or about 88% annually for their 18 months in office).

Thirty-four percent versus Eighty-eight percent

Now, the libs will try to Blame Bush, but it wasn't until the No Drill, No Nuke, No Coal, No Option Democrats took office that the price of gas REEEEALLY sky-rocketed.

Coincidence? I think not. I believe the market saw the Dem takeover of Congress as a suppression of potential new oil sources and hostile to many other viable fuels, in general. Without coal, nuclear, oil, or other currently available technologies there was only one direction for the price of oil.

So, thank your Congressperson the next time you write, call, or e-mail. And click the American Solutions link on the top left of this blog to have real CHANGE (as opposed to that fake politician 's CHANGE being touted by some goofy, continually lying lib running for President).

We Need Much More of This

Beverly Farm is about 12 miles from Gloucester, Massachusetts.

You remember Gloucester. That's the place where 17 teenagers from the same high school decided that getting "preggers" was a great idea.

Now their neighbors, in an annual "Horribles" 4th of July parade, made fun of them using shimmying dancers dressed up as pregnant women and men in diapers crawling out from under a paper mache woman in birthing stirrups.
Some of the writing on the floats is a bit "unrefined", but accurate.

Forward the video to 2:24 and 5:20

I saw one of the Gloucester Gang on a morning show, pleased as proverbial punch to be pregnant (she was 17 years old and legal in Massachusetts). We need more satire and public shaming of kids and the parents who let their children run unsupervised.

Chris C commented that this should not have been placed in the public square because children might have seen it.

However, the Parade of Horribles is an annual event in New England, marked by grotesque displays. You never know what you might see there.
Parents who bring their kids to this parade are as bad as the parents of the Gloucester Gang.

Here are photos from the Gloucester 2006 parade of do you explain this to your kid? Gloucester Puts President in Prison

Of course the people of Gloucester are upset that their town has been satirized. I guess they can "dish it out, but can't take it".

People who beclown themselves by voting for Kerry and Kennedy really should have a better sense of humor.

Obama Screws Military Families and Lefties at the Same Time

Does Barack Hussein Obama believe in reincarnation? In a past life he must have been a Hindu contortionist.

On or about June 24, 2008, His Holiness, the ObaMessiah met with a co-founder of Code Pinko, Jodie Evans, at a $5 million dollar Hollywood fundraiser.
Code Pinko are those lefturds that spit on the efforts of our troops and who are so short sighted and self-absorbed that they cannot comprehend the war we are fighting against Islamification. They cannot grasp the violence of the jihadist, nor can they see the slow infiltration of Europe through Islamist immigration. Check the honor killing pages of the UK Times for more info...

Anywhooo...what did Obama say to Jodie Evans? He told her he would vote AGAINST the FISA bill.
What did he do?
His Grace voted FOR the FISA bill... (LINK) the left is learning what a pure politician their champion of "new" politics really is.

So, he screwed the military families by cavorting with leftists assclowns, and then after he got the money, he lied to the leftist assclowns..

That's a two-fer in the Obama political manual.

BTW Jodie, nice rack...they'll make fine targets for Operation FEEL OUR PAIN.

H/T: Stop the ACLU

Sunday, July 06, 2008

Americans Remove Yellow Cake Uranium from Iraq

What? !?!?

What yellow cake uranium? Joe Wilson told us that Saddam had no desire for yellow cake uranium.

Oh, they must mean the 550 metric TONS that Saddam had hidden -- but I'm sure it was for peaceful purposes. (Just ask Harry "Nuts" Reid or Nancie Pisslosi).

Ummmmm, yellow caaaaaaake......

McCain was Right

McCain railed against the Bush Administration for mismanaging the war in Iraq.

He wanted a surge of forces into the region to wipe out the terrorists.

It's working. But you won't see it in the American media (well maybe Fox News since they're the only ones to present both sides of an argument).

This in from the British TIMES ONLINE: Iraqis lead final purge of Al-Qaeda.

"A huge operation to crush the 1,200 fighters who remained from a terrorist force once estimated at more than 12,000 began on May 10.

Operation Lion’s Roar, in which the Iraqi army combined forces with the Americans’ 3rd Armoured Cavalry Regiment, has already resulted in the death of Abu Khalaf, the Al-Qaeda leader, and the capture of more than 1,000 suspects."

While the Messiah wanted to run away, McCain offered a new strategy. A strategy that is winning.

H/T: Remulak Moxargon

Saturday, July 05, 2008

Nature's Laws

As we decide for whom we will vote we simultaneously decide which direction we want our country to take.

Democrats will tell you that McCain represents Bush's third term, even while the left side of their brain tells them that isn't true -- just another slogan.

What IS true is that the California Supreme Court has approved gay marriage in one of our most populous states. This is just another product of libturds pushing for their own personal brand of licentious freedoms. What is it about gays marrying that liberals view as normal, natural, and in need of protection?

Marriage is essentially a social construct established to protect children that are the product of two people. Especially today, two people don't need this construct to pledge their love. As a matter of fact, during the 1960's the counter-culture liberals denigrated marriage as unnecessary traditionalism. Today we see the breakdown of moral boundaries, the rise of single motherhood, and more children in poverty as a result. Now liberals want us to recognize their artificial form of something they once rejected; an artifice that cannot replicate nature's intent of procreation -- the reason we were made (or evolved) as two genders.

My feelings regarding children in marriage extend also to heterosexual couples who pledge never to have children and actively strive against it. And to those heterosexuals who would choose to engage exclusively in oral or anal sex (if there are any -- which I completely doubt but cannot prove). I would ask them, why get married -- simply to have a legal contract to bind you together? In our already litigious society do we really need a contract to express love?

Homosexuals, by definition, cannot naturally have children. In fact, they must amplify and distort nature to reach that goal. Take the pregnant man for instance (LINK).

First she was a woman, but then she wanted to be a man, so then he wanted to do what only women can do and become pregnant....does anyone else see anything wrong with this picture?
Liberals bitch about how we corrode and distort nature with our man-made pollutants, but don't we also pollute the nature of Mankind by warping one of the basic functions of humans?

Marriage protects children by ensuring they are provided for economically and that they have social models to emulate. Men and woman approach relationships and child-rearing in different ways; complementary ways. Men and men or women and women do not provide complementary roles and the few studies we have, show negative outcomes for children raised in homosexual households, particularly girls raised in lesbian relationships. Sexual identity confusion and even attempts to seduce the young girls by lesbian acquaintances of the "partners" has been repeatedly recorded.

So, why do homosexuals need marriage? Do they feel they need a contract with the government to declare their love? Is that what homosexual love is about - a contract?
Do they believe their union or behavior is as valuable to society as a normal marriage? This is certainly not true for young girls in lesbian arrangements. Similarly, this was not true for the Catholic Church after liberalizing entry into the clergy in the 1970's. As mentioned in previous posts, an overwhelming number of priest scandals were of the homosexual variety.
Perhaps homosexuals have a need to put their relationship "in your face" -- is that the motivation?

Liberals complain that traditional beliefs are outdated and we need to move forward. Love is all that counts. Liberals ask us why we stop them from expressing their love. I would ask them, what if two brothers want to marry, what do we do? Is that acceptable? Is it really just about love? Certainly there can be no tradition-based prohibition against relatives marrying since inbreeding (the reason for some marriage laws) is not possible in homosexual marriages.

In September 2005 the Netherlands permitted a civil union between three people. Is that where we want to go?

The late senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) was a scholar in the field of sociology. Even though he served one of the most liberal states in the Union, Moynihan understood that counter-cultural pressures from the 1960's led to a "dumbing down of deviance".
In November we have an opportunity to voice our disapproval against deviance imposed by a few judges and applauded by Nancy Pelosi and her crew...

Be sure to register...

Friday, July 04, 2008

Celebrate Independence

The flag is the symbol of our country and provides a common icon for all Americans to view as a representation of American ideals.

And, on this blog, we try to help outline the differences between two ideologies that have both embraced the idea of "America".

Conservatives view America as the ultimate ideal of self-governance. They look at who we are, what we've achieved, where we are today. Conservatives look at America as one large family of people striving, like any family, to make the best out of life even if we don't agree with our government. Each family member has their own interests, but they still come together to help one another as individuals. They work for change from the inside out.

Liberals view America as an unfinished portrait. They use dissent to try to "improve" America because they believe that the Founding Fathers used dissent against their government. However, the Founders were dissenting against tyranny, not just government; and I think this is where liberals get lost. While the Founders eschewed big government, liberals from as far back as T.H.Greene and Jane Addams believe that government should be the answer to all of our problems. Liberal dissent is aimed at making things "even" for everyone.
In a sense, a strong sense, liberals are the spoiled children of the American family. "Momma. Timmy has more pudding than me!", might be a common cry heard by both the spoiled child and the liberal. Have you ever seen a family where one child was the "dissenter", one who also tries to run the house?

While conservatives celebrate basic human values that have withstood the test of time and human nature from our earliest civilizations, values that have led to our successes; liberals try to install "dead end" values such as "pay for no work" welfare, moral relativism, and gay marriage (a value that has never been accepted by any civilized ideology).

On this Fourth of July it is important to understand the struggle caused by the spoiled child and the damage that self-serving dissent does to a family.

God Bless our family as we try to educate and correct the spoiled children.

"Good Men love Freedom; all others Love not Freedom, but License" - John Milton

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

I Have Stopped Using the Word "Libtard"

I realized that I have been somewhat condescending to a group of people who are really just trying to "get by".
They don't really hurt anyone and, though they think differently than many of us, there is no reason to disparage them. The word association I have used may be hurtful to them and therefore I have decided to stop using the term "libtard"

It just isn't right to pick on people who cannot help themselves.

And so, I have written a letter to ARC (formerly the Association for Retarded Citizens) and apologized for lumping them together with liberals. Associating the suffix "tard" with "liberal" may be hurtful to the folks at ARC.

From now on liberals will be called: ass clowns, morons, imbeciles, self-important egomaniacs, jackasses, jag-offs, selfish bastards, baby-murderers, socialist scum, pedophiles, Satanists...etc.

But never again "Libtards".

You've Heard About It -- Now It's Here

Lay your eyes on the dreaded OBAMA BUS O' DEATH!

Yes, this is Obama's much rumored means of disposing of those folks who are..ahem..uncomfortable to have around.

Grandma...Rev "Not So" Wright...Samantha Powers...Austan Goolsbee....Public Financing...Wesley Clark....

but there is still one question...
Now that Obama has signed the FISA "secret wiretapping" bill, how is he going to make his disciples happy and throw himself under this puppy?

Maybe we can post this at Humor Blogs (LINK)

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

My Final Word on Wesley Clark

Wesley Clark stated that McCain's service didn't prepare him to be President.

Does military service prepare you to be President?

Yes, it certainly does. Employers around the country recognize that veterans have undergone professional leadership training that rivals that of top corporate executives. The President is the Chief Executive of the country, and so this training certainly does help. What kind of training has Obama had? Community organizer? Again...huh?

Why is it not permissible for Wesley Clark to attack John McCain, but it WAS okay for vets to attack John Kerry?
Two words -- Genghis Khan (pronounced Jen-jis Khan by illerate assclowns). Karma realigned itself on John Kerry. After betraying troops in the field 30 years earlier, Kerry put in motion a backlash that surfaced in 2003 and 2004. Filed under "What comes around, goes around."

Since this is a race between two people, it is helpful to compare.

Is it permissible to attack Obama's lack of military service?
Yes, according to the Left Obama will be a ChickenHawk because we all know (though Dems are in denial), that Obama will not withdraw troops from Iraq. But, if he does, he will have to redeploy them to kill Al-Qaeda. So, in keeping with Leftard standards of incivility, Obama will be defined by their own words as a ChickenHawk during that redeployment.

Libtards vs the free market and the laws of supply and demand...

The following was sent to me by my father, who evidently wrote to his senator about gas prices. This is the email the senator, Barbara Boxer of Cali-Mexi-fornia, or most likely her stooges, sent back to him. At first, I was going to highlight the ‘funny’ parts, but the more I read it, I thought Hell, the whole thing is funny, so here ya go. I know I don’t need to explain how retarded the ‘thinking’ is behind this response to the people who read ROGUE’S blog, so I won’t. I will say that I am shocked that some people believe this line of crap though. Please, pick this apart. It’s not altered in any way, except my fathers name and email address.

My Dad wrote this header. He is of course right.
“Professing to be wise they show themselves to be fools. Tax & spend, so they can give you a handout if they choose to do so.”

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:48 AM
Subject: Responding to your message

Thank you for contacting me regarding high gasoline prices. I appreciate the opportunity to hear your views on this important issue, and I share your concerns.
Gasoline prices reached an all-time high this year, and costs for food and other basic necessities are rising drastically. As millions of Americans struggle under this increasing burden, oil companies continue to report massive, record-breaking profits - $123 billion last year alone. This is unacceptable, and I want to assure you that I am working hard to lower prices and protect Americans from price gouging.
I am proud to be an original co-sponsor of S.3044, the Consumer-First Energy Act of 2008. This important bill would impose a windfall profits tax on oil companies to discourage price gouging and to help consumers offset the high costs of energy products, punish any country or company colluding in setting the price of oil, and limit excessive speculation in oil markets.
S.3044 also includes a provision that is similar to legislation I authored that would require the Federal Trade Commission to investigate possible manipulation of gasoline prices any time prices rise rapidly.
Unfortunately, on June 10, 2008, the Senate minority blocked further consideration of S.3044. At a time when so many Americans are struggling to make ends meet and having to make the impossible choice between buying food for their families and filling up the gas tank, I am deeply disturbed that some of my colleagues prevented this important bill from moving forward.
Opening up drilling in the United States is not the best way to achieve lower gas prices. For example, drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) would provide us with six months of oil at most, and at great cost. Furthermore, it would be more than a decade before we saw any of that oil. Ultimately, we need to move away from our dependence on oil and gasoline by developing renewable and efficient energy technologies. Right now, we need to go after the big oil companies that are holding Americans hostage with their exorbitantly high prices.
Americans deserve better than oil companies that gouge consumers in order to make huge profits, and Congress needs to take action to help alleviate this crisis. Rest assured, I will continue working for the passage of S.3044, and I will keep fighting to help Americans enjoy fair and reasonable energy prices.
Again, thank you for writing to me. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future on this or other issues that concern you.
Barbara BoxerUnited States SenatorPlease visit my website at

Waiting for the Next Obamifecation UPDATED

On the top of the left panel I've added the Obama Oil Flip Flop Count Up Clock™.
Obama has exceeded my 10 day prediction and is yet to flip on this issue, but I feel it is I'm keeping the clock running.

The American people are in overwhelming support of drilling for new sources of oil.
Obama is dead-set against oil exploration. In fact, he doesn't even care that oil costs so much,
"his only problem with higher gas prices is that they've gone up too fast -- saying he'd prefer a 'gradual' increase instead. " LINK
Not only is he out of touch with working class Americans, he is truly the dumbest man in the Presidential race, and has been for some time.

Speaking of time, it's only a matter of time before Obama Obamifecates and leads the Sheeple to believe that he was actually FOR oil drilling all along.

And so, I have placed a clock on the blog to see how long it actually takes for The Lyin' Messiah™ to flip. I'm giving it 10 days -- tops. Any other projections?